the fact is the people concerned are fully aware of having done something wrong, the police brought charges of assault against the attackers, it was the crown prosecution service who dropped the ball at the first court hearing by not bringing the cctv evidence to court, they ended up being admonished for their incompetence by the magistrate and within a short period after this dropped the case on the grounds it was not in the public interest to proceed with the case ("for not in the public interest" read we have screwed this up lets get the hell out of this case).
It was shortly after this withdrawal that a prominent local councillor and others started putting it around that the magistrates had thrown the case out due to lack of evidence a fact they knew to be untrue, they even went so far as to inform Toby Perkins this untruth.
One of the really interesting facts is that as a result of the attacks on my disabled partner and special needs son i posted an appeal for witnesses on another forum, and i did receive a reply from a witness who did see the attack however communications were soon stopped and the witness was to intimidated to come forward.
At the same time this was happening a person called daftman01 posted on the forum privileged information about me and an unrelated complaint i had made to the police a couple of years previously i might add that this is information that was only available to the police via the police national computer, and also details of my complaint to the manager of the library again privileged information that should not have been imparted to anyone, after an investigation by the police counter corruption unit they were able to confirm that this information came from not only a Council computer but a computer operated by the employees and management of the felons who had committed the attacks, now lets look at this a little further, these guards who attacked my family gained information about me as a result of their position working for the Council and supposedly in co-operation with the police, the Council then provided them with the resources ie one Council computer and the time to use said computer during working hours to attempt to discredit me by painting me as someone who makes invalid complaints, it is inconceivable that the management also were unaware of what was happening particularly as the guards manager made it clear to me she had a close working relationship with the library manager so it is obvious to me where my complaints to the library manager came from.
the Councils Executive Directors response to my complaint of breaching the data protection act is that " WE THE COUNCIL CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT OUR EMPLOYEES CHOSE TO DO IN THEIR OWN TIME" that is the most self serving and corrupt explanation imaginable when taking into account what truly happened, the council know they have broken the law on numerous occasions and will clutch at any straw in an attempt to shirk their responsibility for their own criminal behaviour, this could only be achieved as a result of the tacit support of a number of councillors including their previous and present leaders, how anyone could in all conscience vote for this bunch of CROOKS defeats me.