Chesterfield Online Forum

General Category => Sport => Topic started by: Alsatian on June 14, 2012, 02:52:58 PM

Title: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 14, 2012, 02:52:58 PM
Is anyone else totally p155ed off with all this bloody football on the TV?  >:(

*Runs for cover!*
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 14, 2012, 03:33:25 PM
No!!!!!
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Pete on June 14, 2012, 03:51:49 PM
Yes!!!!!  :P
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 14, 2012, 04:33:43 PM
That's 2 - 1 to the p155ed off team then!  Yp
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 14, 2012, 04:34:25 PM
3-1 now  ;)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: k4blades on June 14, 2012, 04:38:18 PM
Haven't really seen that much of it, I think the coverage has been a bit poor, and the BBC seem determined to constantly dig up bad news about it, probably because ITV got most of  the rights. I'm hoping England get through, if the results fall right we will end up playing Spain, while we are there next week. Dreading the Olympics coverage though, football is the national game.......running is what you do when you miss the bus!
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Old Cruser on June 14, 2012, 05:49:15 PM
YESSSS === it's time they set up a special station just for the Euro and sports crap AND LEAVE MY STUFF ALONE!!  >:(
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 14, 2012, 07:51:26 PM
Fills the gap nicely between the end of last season and the beginning of next, shame major tournaments are only every 2 years
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: simondjuk on June 15, 2012, 08:33:02 AM
YESSSS === it's time they set up a special station just for the Euro and sports crap AND LEAVE MY STUFF ALONE!!  >:(

Isnt that Sky Sports?

The Football is on for 2 weeks.  For the remaining 50 weeks of the year we have to suffer shite like Eastenders and Coronation Street.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Old Cruser on June 15, 2012, 08:36:43 AM
What's wrong with the 'normal' TV setting up a special sports channel, if they put it all on sky sports I would be well pleased but they don't - so they could run a year round sports channel - covering all sports not  just football.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: simondjuk on June 15, 2012, 01:14:12 PM
What's wrong with the 'normal' TV setting up a special sports channel, if they put it all on sky sports I would be well pleased but they don't - so they could run a year round sports channel - covering all sports not  just football.

As with everything, its all down to cost.  Im sure the sports that get shown get a lot of cash inputs when they buy the rights to show.  If they did it on 'normal' TV it would be full of adverts (still thats better then cricket)  *ducks*
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Old Cruser on June 15, 2012, 06:19:27 PM
Apart from the BBC I think all of them get adverts  >:( if you tape a half hour programme and fast forward the adverts you get about 20mins >:(
Apart from showing the sports we get the news inundated with it as well  >:(
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 15, 2012, 07:46:27 PM
Apart from the BBC I think all of them get adverts  >:( if you tape a half hour programme and fast forward the adverts you get about 20mins >:(
Apart from showing the sports we get the news inundated with it as well  >:(

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Old Cruser on June 16, 2012, 08:11:05 PM
Not bloody likely Slacker!  :)
and what did they do last night ----- messed up my taping as the fffff football ran late!! grrrrr
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 16, 2012, 08:46:05 PM
Look on the bright side. 1st time the England squad have ever beaten Sweden in a competative game.

I can't help being British  ;) Rule Britannia and such  8)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Old Cruser on June 17, 2012, 02:15:32 AM
@ Fly --- well whoopie Doo!!  :)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 18, 2012, 09:32:24 PM
Not sure that any team has been outstanding
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Pete on June 20, 2012, 09:44:53 AM
Not p155ed off now! :)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: simondjuk on June 20, 2012, 12:48:09 PM
Spoke to my Italian mate earlier and hes fairly confident that Italy will lose.  Im not so sure.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 20, 2012, 05:13:31 PM
Little known fact: Danny Welbeck's dad, Stan, was a bomb disposal expert
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: simondjuk on June 21, 2012, 08:31:14 AM
Little known fact: Danny Welbeck's dad, Stan, was a bomb disposal expert

very good  ;D
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 21, 2012, 05:08:10 PM
And I thought it was just a useless piece in info  ::)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 21, 2012, 06:55:53 PM
And I thought it was just a useless piece in info  ::)

..................and that's two of us then!!!  8)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 21, 2012, 07:19:38 PM
Too subtle Fly?
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Pete on June 21, 2012, 07:25:44 PM
Haven't a clue what you're on about - explanation please. :)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 21, 2012, 07:27:33 PM
Too subtle Fly?

Totally missed it mate  :))
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 21, 2012, 08:46:26 PM
Try shouting the name
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 21, 2012, 09:15:21 PM
I've got it now you half wit. Simon's post jogged my head  ::)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 22, 2012, 07:38:48 PM
Try shouting the name

WTF?!!!  :-[
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Fly on June 22, 2012, 08:09:59 PM
Quote
Little known fact: Danny Welbeck's dad, Stan, was a bomb disposal expert

Danny's dad, Stan.
Stan'd' well back'beck' Bomb disposal .

Quote
WTF?!!!
I hope your taking the p1ss, or hitting yourself in the forehead with a fork  Yp
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 23, 2012, 01:37:18 PM
Danny's dad, Stan.
Stan'd' well back'beck' Bomb disposal .
I hope your taking the p1ss, or hitting yourself in the forehead with a fork  Yp

 :-[ :-[ :-[ (fork marks on forehead) Doh!  :(
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 24, 2012, 11:08:51 PM
well we made a complete 'Ash of the penalty shoot out!!!!!
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 25, 2012, 06:32:02 AM
Someone asked me a prediction earler in the day and I said defeat on penalties. Why didn't I pit a bet on? Doh!
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 25, 2012, 11:21:38 AM
I called every penalty last night just by looking at the faces of the players as they walked forward. You could tell the ones who had doubt. (Actually I got one slightly wrong, I said Young would put his over the bar!!)

So team for the next qualifier.
If you are looking to a team that can play in 2014 then Terry, Cole, Gerrard, Parker, Ferdinand , Lampard, Barry and probably Defoe have got to be overlooked.
I doubt however that Woy will impload the team in one go so I suspect the first 4 named above will be in that team (unless of course by then Terry is in a prison cell!!)
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Alsatian on June 25, 2012, 01:07:50 PM
Why didn't I pit a bet on? Doh!

You been watching too much 'Allo Allo'?
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 25, 2012, 02:24:21 PM
Woy says we can take positives.
"I think we have done well to come through the tournament without losing a match in normal time at least. True but as the 6th best team in the world we scrapped a draw against the 14th, were lucky to beat the 17th and were goal line technology away from drawing with the 52nd. and to put that into prospective 52 is lower than such power houses as Wales Scotland, Armenia, Peru, Libya and Iran!
"There are good young players. We are doing well at under-21 level True, in the main because Stuart Pearce has them playing attacking football. But out of the last 4 U21 Tournament squads only 4 players made it into last nights starting 11. One of those was Scott Parker from the 2002 squad!
"We defended well throughout but could have attacked better."   Really? So whose tactics were they that told them to defend then?
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Pete on June 25, 2012, 02:30:30 PM
To be fair Jon, and I'm no expert, but when he got the job all the pundits I read said he didn't have enough time to do his thing in time for EURO 2012.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 25, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
Correct thats exactly what all his friends in the media were saying because they all knew dam well that we were heading for dour defensive performances that would end up in failure when we came across a half decent team.
As I've said before he sets up his teams not to lose, he'd rather win 1-0 than 5-4 he'd rather lose 1-0 without trying to win than 3-0 trying to win.
To put his 'success' into context he has a win %age over his 30 odd year management career of 43%. Cappello's is 57%. Errikson's is 51%. Even the Wally with the brolly Steve McLaren is 44%.
Really 'succesful' managers like Mourinho (69%) Ferguson (58%) Guardiola (72%) Paisley (58%) send their teams out to win.

To give you more idea the top sides in the English premier league last year averaged approx 13 attempts on goal per game with 8 of them being on target.
The worst team averaged 6 and 2
England who remember didn't play a team ranked anywhere above them averaged 9 and 4.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 25, 2012, 05:28:39 PM
Maybe he was picked because at WBA & Fulham he turned average players into teams hard to beat. An England manager can't get his cheque book out and buy the best players in the world like the top 4 or 5 Premiership teams can. How many top strikers and goalkeepers in England are English? Says it all when the reserve goalkeeper is not even first choice for a Championship team and spent last season on loan in League 2.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on June 25, 2012, 06:07:30 PM
Thats the point though Andy. A team hard to beat. Hard to beat by their main rivals ie the Swansea Norwich Everton Stokes of this world. Not hard to beat for either Manchester club or Chelsea or Arsenal or Spurs.
At the European championships he had on ranking the 4th best team in the tournament.
So he was the equivalent of Spurs.
He drew with France (Stoke)
Only just Defeated Sweden (QPR)
Struggled to beat Ukraine (someone mid ranking from Div 1)
Then get outplayed and knocked out by Italy (Norwich)

He was picked because a) people were clamouring for an English manager and b) he was seen as a better alternative for the FA than Rednapp.
The reserve keeper is from such low levels because others rated above them refuse to go and sit on the bench with zero chance of playing.
Spain have played most of the tournament without a recognised striker (even when Ladyboy was on the pitch) Fact it you need attacking intent and we didn't have any.
We've got Montenegro Ukraine and Poland in the world cup qualifying. If we go there to defend we are going to struggle.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: Slacker on June 25, 2012, 08:55:04 PM
Bit harsh on Italy, they held their own with Spain. I predict a German win.
Title: Re: EURO 2012
Post by: therealjr on July 09, 2012, 11:53:40 PM
What's the difference between Roy Hodgson playing an attacking formation for England and a Scottish distilled liquor?
 
One of them's wisky. The other one's a Scottish distilled liquor