Chesterfield Online Forum
General Category => Chesterfield Discussion => Topic started by: Pete on May 31, 2012, 05:56:22 PM
-
Story has been running for a while now, but the final judgement, 22 years minimum, was just another eye-opener. Apparently the guilty man had been a right nasty piece of work and had a long list of convictions.
-
Apparently the guilty man had been a right nasty piece of work and had a long list of convictions.
The jury aren't told this information before they deliberate.
I know, I've done jury service :)