Chesterfield Online Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Slacker on June 29, 2012, 07:01:01 PM
-
Nobody would disagree that getting flooded is devastating but when uninsured homes get priority for aid doesn't it make you wonder why bother dishing out your hard-earned on buildings and contents insurance?
I know some of the high risk areas find it hard to get insured against floods but surely that is reflected in the price you pay for your house.
-
We've just changed our insurers they were costing an arm and a leg, there it goes again Slacker, those that don't bother 'get' !!!
-
.................and what's the difference between someone not paying Buildings & Contents Insurance and someone not paying Car Insurance?
Uninsured car drivers don't get assistance, so why should homeowners? >:(
-
Because uninsured drivers don't get to appear on news programmes crying their eyes out because they have no insurance!!!
-
Motor insurance is compulsory because of the damage you can do to others. Though I've not seen someone who only has 3rd party asking for a government or council handout
-
It's been mentioned everybody's insurance may go up to help flood victim's.
-
It's been mentioned everybody's insurance may go up to help flood victim's.
I suppose it should come as no surprise, as we all pay higher car insurance premiums to make up for the uninsured w*nkers >:(
-
I suppose in a way its a fairer system as long as the people we subsidise are insured in the first place, as a lot will not have realised when buying their house it was going to get flooded in the future, not quite the same as an uninsured driver.