Chesterfield Online Forum

General Category => Entertainment => Topic started by: Fly on August 23, 2012, 05:09:07 PM

Title: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Fly on August 23, 2012, 05:09:07 PM

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5inyRG3B_jukpOIuT7G4-ThVYF4uQ?docId=N0149821345731818443A (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5inyRG3B_jukpOIuT7G4-ThVYF4uQ?docId=N0149821345731818443A)

Personally, I think he should stay locked up, eye for an eye, he took a life for his own gratuity  >:(

Title: Re: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Pete on August 23, 2012, 05:30:51 PM

They should throw away the key.

Title: Re: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Alsatian on August 23, 2012, 06:13:27 PM

What they said

Title: Re: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Old Cruser on August 24, 2012, 03:01:13 PM

Agreed!
 I enjoyed some of his stuff (not the stupid airy fairy stuff he wrote whilst high)
He had his problems (Yoko was one!)
Wonder if he would still have that raw belting voice had he lived q?

Title: Re: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Scimitar on August 24, 2012, 06:31:18 PM

Preferred John Lennon to Paul - wobbly head - look at me look at me-sycophantic- up his own bottom - McCartney! ;D

Title: Re: No parole for Lennon's killer.
Post by: Old Cruser on August 25, 2012, 02:19:12 PM

Yes I would agree with that Scimitar.
Paul was my favourite back then, until I went to see them in Sheffield, he was so up his own - that I went off him.