Chesterfield Online Forum

General Category => Politics => Topic started by: chesterfieldchris on October 03, 2012, 10:02:24 AM

Title: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: chesterfieldchris on October 03, 2012, 10:02:24 AM
POST DELETED AT USER'S REQUEST
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Pete on October 03, 2012, 11:01:36 AM
No - I think he's out of touch with the real world.
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Old Cruser on October 03, 2012, 11:39:31 AM
No! I think it's time they all bought a caravan out of their extortionate money and commuted
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Slacker on October 03, 2012, 04:46:19 PM
He took them to court and won so I guess there was a weakness in the contract
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Stuart on October 03, 2012, 04:59:03 PM
He took them to court and won so I guess there was a weakness in the contract
A contract that one imagines was drawn up with some input from the union's President (or whatever he is.)
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Fly on October 03, 2012, 05:01:29 PM
Link ?
I can't find any news about winning the case.

And yes they should if it was part of his retirement scheme.
Not sure how they can afford it though, or why he needs the flat.
Other than being obstinate !!
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: chesterfieldchris on October 03, 2012, 05:03:34 PM
POST DELETED AT USER'S REQUEST
Title: Re: Should the NUM pay for Scargills flat?
Post by: Fly on October 03, 2012, 05:07:02 PM
Think it's called greed Cchris  ;)

Nice read here.
http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Is-NUM-suffering-from-Scargill-syndrome-20120908 (http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Is-NUM-suffering-from-Scargill-syndrome-20120908)