Chesterfield Online Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Fly on February 14, 2015, 09:26:10 PM

Title: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Fly on February 14, 2015, 09:26:10 PM
Had a bout of petty name calling with ChesterfieldChris from CF today and last night. He actually started it refering to this forum as the 'socialist republic of Chesterfield site' on the HSBC thread. At that time, no-one had said a word about him or CF on this forum.
Quote
He is playing up to the politics of envy and taking advantage of the mindset aptly demonstrated on the socialist republic of Chesterfield site. Tax avoidance by the poor (dodging £20 vat by paying cash in hand) is fine, but a rich person dodging £200,000 is wrong. Even if that represents the same percentage of the persons income.
This evening Chris has made another post on the same thread on CF.
(http://i1057.photobucket.com/albums/t382/Barry_Fly/CCInsult_zpsxalhvfnl.jpg) (http://s1057.photobucket.com/user/Barry_Fly/media/CCInsult_zpsxalhvfnl.jpg.html)
I believe this is aimed at me personally. He knows damn well I have very little contact with my children due to circumstances beyond my control. He even participated in a thread on here when he was a posting member.
http://chesterfieldonline.org/index.php/topic,1494.msg9122.html#msg9122 (http://chesterfieldonline.org/index.php/topic,1494.msg9122.html#msg9122)
Obviously we can't read what he posted, he threatened us with actions if we didn't remove all his posts when he spat his dummy and left.

Personally, if the post he made today 'IS' aimed at me, he has just shown his true colours to all that can see his post.
Lower than a snakes belly in a wagon wheel rut. Devoid of anybody else's feelings  :(

I am less than happy tonight  ::)
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2015, 10:21:51 AM
Ignore him mate, he's just a bully.

Just read a few of his longer threads, there's more hate in there than is good for anyone.

Nasty man.
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: therealjr on February 15, 2015, 11:56:18 AM
Funny thing about money. Yes it can buy you big houses, fancy cars and allow you to lavish presents on people (though you could argue that's buying someone's love?).  It can't buy you manners, dignity or class.
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2015, 12:21:51 PM
Well said Jon.

Him and another poster over there constantly slag off folks on this forum for being socialist - including me.

Funny how I started my own company in 1990, went limited in the year 2000 and have been Managing Director for 15 more years. Not exactly Che Guevara, am I?

Basically if you don't support the Tories, you're a member of the Socialist Republic of Chesterfield.

Morons.

Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: poppy on February 15, 2015, 01:42:57 PM
Pretty unpleasant stuff. I've decided to give it a miss for the foreseeable future. Pity really as there used to be some really good discussions, especially about local stuff. People like blink, beefheart and baxton moor don't contribute now and it just seems to be bickering and moaning.  :(
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: therealjr on February 15, 2015, 02:32:45 PM
oh the irony of someone posting the below elsewhere, lurking on here and then going off somewhere else and calling someone a twerp!!
Interesting that they didnt try to claim that they did possess class, manners and dignity just chose to throw round more insults.

I'd have thought the below ought to have had an amendement?
"Or alternatively I could threated to consult my solicitor"
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2015, 05:24:41 PM
Funny how the biggest bully CF has ever seen carries the slogan "Haters only hate the things they can't have and the people they can't be." This appears every time he posts - yet he'll accuse me, or anyone who posts on here of starting the trouble. It's obviously him judging folks by his standards, allowing no one to hold views that are are not the same as his, ie based on personal wealth, what car he drives, his house, etc etc. Materialism gone mad.

He redefines hypocrisy and has, with a little help from his friends, brought Chesterfield forum to its knees. Such a shame, it used to be a great place.

There is an easy way to stop all this nonsense - if he stops coming on here and gets on with moderating his forum. The other Mod and Admin  seem to have given him carte blanche hijack all and every thread to suit his own bullying politics - ie a proper Tory.
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Slacker on February 15, 2015, 08:40:09 PM
I see being called a socialist a compliment
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Fly on February 16, 2015, 12:15:36 AM
Perhaps Indy is right Cchris. Hope you never find out why I found your comment hurtful.
It isn't something I'd wish on someone :-{


EDIT:   This was posted before Cchris edited his post on CF.
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: simondjuk on February 16, 2015, 11:47:11 AM
Shame other posters of a certain forum don't try their luck on Sheffield Forum give them 24 hours.

And thats why I dont post on there, i just look nowadays.

Just ignore him Fly (not nicheuk), not worth it is hes going to lower himself to insults on a forum.  Keyboard warrior?
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Fly on February 16, 2015, 05:56:11 PM
Quote
if somebody is offended by my comments that were not aimed at his specific circumstances (although I can see how he may feel they are) then I apologise for them
Without backtracking many posts Cchris, several members of both forums have participated in petty, silly name calling acts these past couple of years. Your last one, if aimed at me or not, I felt, was a little below the belt. Hence my post. Either way I accept your apology.
On the other hand, I feel it is also fair to say that you over exagerated with the paedophile name calling towards yourself. I stated i believe, that you were, 'part of a political party that turned a blind eye', but, you asked if I was man enough to stand and apologise to you for this then yes I am. I apologise, sorry.
I'm also sorry about the lard arse comments and such as well, but I thought by your manner you were strong enough to take them all as tongue in cheek comments.
As regards removing comments from here or CF, let them stay. It's our policy for comments not to be removed so I don't see it would be fair to ask Sap to move any from there. There's enough gaps in threads on here where all your previous posts have been removed.

Therefore I bid you good day. Have fun with your family, cars and the good charity work you do  :)

Barry.

Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: therealjr on February 16, 2015, 09:38:36 PM
My last comment. Firstly it's Jon there's no H. Secondly at no stage have I ever accused anybody of child abuse. I choose my words carefully and try not to post when either angry or p****d to avoid any interpretations other than my intended one., if you feel I accused you of same then that is your interpretation but not my intention. I'm not sure I actually can apologise for that but if it makes life easier I will do..
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Old Cruser on February 17, 2015, 04:02:48 PM
Oh dear, what have I missed???  :-?

I haven't been on that site for awhile, the last time I was browsing there, there was a really boring, stupid, childish, argument going on between two members.
In fact I reached a point when I thought it was 'put on' to bump up views - I stopped going on.

As for CC he needs to move on from this forum, he's just like a dog with a bloody bone, just can't put us to the back of his mind ( must be cos we are so memorable  O:-) )
For a grown man with supposedly his own business, it's childish, inappropriate behaviour -should know better.
 
Much rather be on here with you lot  :-*  :-*

I'm back by the way  ;)
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Pete on February 17, 2015, 04:26:35 PM
>> I'm back by the way

Really? ;)

Hope all is OK with you :)
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: therealjr on February 17, 2015, 06:14:49 PM
Some of us have been reading the Facebook updates OC. Welcome back
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Slacker on February 17, 2015, 06:27:21 PM
:-*
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Old Cruser on February 17, 2015, 07:35:47 PM
>> I'm back by the way

Really? ;)

Hope all is OK with you :)

I survived Pete improving by the day thanks  ;)
Title: Re: Coincidence, or lower than low ?
Post by: Old Cruser on February 17, 2015, 07:38:01 PM
Some of us have been reading the Facebook updates OC. Welcome back

Ahh ok, I used the TV whilst in  for F/B but couldn't get on here Jon