The Metropolitan Police force now have over 1,000 victims of phone hacking by the News of the World - and they estimate the cost of investigating this will cost £50 million.
I think, in cases like this, in fact in a lot of cases, the villains should foot the bill if found guilty.
I thought this a long time ago when some criminal or other pleaded not guilty - only to be found guilty in court - with approximate costs of over two million pounds.
Is there not a need for some kind of conditions imposed on suspected criminals, who, knowing full well they are guilty, plead not guilty and hope their legal bods are good enough to get a not guilty verdict?