Author Topic: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws  (Read 13971 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chesterfieldchris

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #45 on: September 11, 2012, 07:51:03 PM »
POST DELETED AT USER'S REQUEST

chesterfieldchris

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #46 on: September 11, 2012, 09:30:16 PM »
POST DELETED AT USER'S REQUEST

therealjr

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2,148
    • View Profile
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #47 on: September 11, 2012, 10:33:02 PM »
ok then Chris, if it isn't so cushy
1. Why do you do it?
2. How can you afford very expensive motor cars
3. How can you afford to plan to emigrate if the Labour party get back in and threaten to tax you in order to run the economy as they want?

The facts are this. Under a conservative government championing business, the few and the rich (sorry of you don't like that description but frankly .... tough) you stand to gain and as such you will argue that their approach is correct.
Under a Labour government championing the many you stand to lose so you argue that their approach is wrong.
Nothing wrong in that at all, the I'm alright Jack attitude is prevelant on both sides of the argument. Just dont expect us to believe that your beliefs are anything other than those under which you stand to gain the most.
I'm not an Alcoholic. They go to meetings
I'm a drunk I go to the pub

k4blades

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #48 on: September 12, 2012, 07:32:38 AM »
Once again JR, ignoring everything that doesn't suit your pont of view.
How can bankruptng the country be good for the many as you put it.

chesterfieldchris

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #49 on: September 12, 2012, 09:53:44 AM »
POST DELETED AT USER'S REQUEST

Slacker

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2,547
    • View Profile
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #50 on: September 12, 2012, 09:14:36 PM »
2 sides to every argument, I don't have a problem with Chris and Kev airing their views

therealjr

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2,148
    • View Profile
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #51 on: September 12, 2012, 09:25:34 PM »
Neither do I, But I hope they take the Obi Wan Kenobi test.
I'm not an Alcoholic. They go to meetings
I'm a drunk I go to the pub

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #52 on: September 12, 2012, 09:35:16 PM »
What's the Obi Wan Kenobi test?
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

therealjr

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2,148
    • View Profile
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #53 on: September 12, 2012, 09:58:14 PM »
Luke: Ben! Why didn't you tell me? You told me that Darth Vader betrayed and murdered my father.
Obi-Wan: Your father... was seduced by the Dark Side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and "became" Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true... from a certain point of view.
Luke: A certain point of view?
Obi-Wan: Luke, you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
I'm not an Alcoholic. They go to meetings
I'm a drunk I go to the pub

k4blades

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #54 on: September 13, 2012, 10:17:25 AM »
2 sides to every argument, I don't have a problem with Chris and Kev airing their views

Likewise. I much prefer the grwon up, debate the issues, both sides put forward an arguement approach to the silly name calling and personal attack approach that may occur from time to time.
Yes, both sides have a point of view........but mine is the correct one. So there.

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #55 on: September 13, 2012, 01:38:58 PM »
 :))
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

k4blades

  • Guest
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #56 on: September 13, 2012, 01:42:28 PM »
QED

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #57 on: September 13, 2012, 01:48:01 PM »
 :)) :)) :))
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Alsatian

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 3,175
    • View Profile
Re: Vince Cable reiterates his opposition to 'fire at will' employment laws
« Reply #58 on: September 13, 2012, 02:47:24 PM »
QED

QI..............sorry, thought this was a 'name the tv programme' thread!!  >;
Fertility Is Hereditary, Chances Are If Your Parents Didn't Have Children Neither Will You

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk