Author Topic: Syrian chemical weapons attack  (Read 14628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fly

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,169
  • ' M8IFY '
    • View Profile
    • Taximania
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2013, 10:34:29 PM »
Good !
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair

Old Cruser

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,794
  • Water please Not wine
    • View Profile
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2013, 11:48:52 AM »
It's time Parliament found a voice.
Well done to Milliband for speaking common sense.
The old lady with the wonky middle finger

Slacker

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2,547
    • View Profile
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2013, 01:20:20 PM »
We are in UN, NATO and EU so why is it us alone that gets dragged into conflicts with USA. Horrible though it is in Syria it's a civil war so it's not our place to take sides. In some ways the rebels are the same groups that we've fought against in other parts of the Middle East.

Fly

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,169
  • ' M8IFY '
    • View Profile
    • Taximania
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2013, 06:57:06 PM »
My last couple of posts were after hearing the votes in parliament last night.  ;D

I'm not smiling now I've just read this.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/30/white-house-syria-intelligence-air-strikes

Does Obama think he's got to make himself look as big as Bush by firing a few weapons ??
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2013, 07:32:05 PM »
Just had a quick read from Fly's link - and this paragraph stood out:

"The British vote, which came despite a strong plea from prime minister David Cameron to back any US military action, emboldened congressional critics of the administration, who are now calling for a similar vote before force is authorised. According to an NBC poll, almost 80% of Americans believe Obama should get congressional authorisation before using force in Syria, while 50% were completely opposed to a military strike."

So the average American is not 100% behind their President...

Who knows, having shown that the Labour Party and the average Brit are not behind Cameron - we might show that we have the guts to stand up to the American elite (who will make money out of a war) and give folks in other countries the support and encouragment to stand up for common sense.

This is good. We should be looking at humanitarian aid for the wounded and dispossessed Syrian people not looking to start another war.

Right. Now lets look at this so-called Special Relationship b*ll*cks. What exactly do we get from it? Do our arms producers get preference? Does our prime minister get anything back?

I don't know.

Anybody?

I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Old Cruser

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,794
  • Water please Not wine
    • View Profile
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2013, 07:57:24 PM »
Poached this from Wikipedia


The two nations are bound together by shared history, an overlap in religion and a common language and legal system, and kinship ties that reach back hundreds of years, including kindred, ancestral lines among English Americans, Scottish Americans, Welsh Americans, and Scotch-Irish Americans.

Through times of war and rebellion, peace and estrangement, as well as becoming friends and allies, the UK and the USA cemented these deeply rooted links during World War II into what is known as the "Special Relationship", described in 2009 by British political commentator Christiane Amanpour as "the key trans-Atlantic alliance",[1] which the U.S. Senate Chair on European Affairs acknowledged in 2010 as "one of the cornerstones of stability around the world."[2]

Today, the relationship with the United States represents the "most important bilateral partnership" in current British foreign policy,[3] and the American foreign policy affirms its relationship with the United Kingdom as its most important bilateral relationship,[4][5] as evidenced in aligned political affairs, mutual cooperation in the areas of trade, commerce, finance, technology, academics, as well as the arts and sciences; the sharing of government and military intelligence, and joint combat operations and peacekeeping missions carried out between the United States Armed Forces and the British Armed Forces. The UK has always been the biggest foreign investor in the USA and vice versa.

The two countries combined make up a huge percentage of world trade, a significant impact of the cultures of many other countries and territories, and are the largest economies and the most populous nodes of the Anglosphere, with a combined population of over 370 million as of 2010. Together, they have given the English language a dominant role in many sectors of the modern world.

There is a maritime boundary between the British dependent territories of the British Virgin Islands and Anguilla, and the United States' dependent territories of the US Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.[6][7]

According to a 2013 BBC World Service Poll, 74% of Americans view the United Kingdom positively, with only 14% expressing a negative view. However, British views of the U.S. are much more sharply divided, with 46% viewing the U.S. positively and 46% viewing the U.S. negatively.[8]

The old lady with the wonky middle finger

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #36 on: August 30, 2013, 08:04:24 PM »
Just a thought - from someone who knows...

I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Fly

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,169
  • ' M8IFY '
    • View Profile
    • Taximania
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2013, 08:44:26 PM »
Take no notice Fly, it's just Rupert Murdoch throwing his doll out of the pram - he's still hurting from us kicking his fat Australian ass.   :)

There is an easy way to stop stuff like that winding you up - don't read the Sun or visit it's website - bag a shite anyway, will probably close down when Page 3 drops its tits...  :))
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Fly

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,169
  • ' M8IFY '
    • View Profile
    • Taximania
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #39 on: August 31, 2013, 09:09:32 PM »
Quote
don't read the Sun or visit it's website - bag a shite anyway
Got to buy it on a Saturday  ;)
Our_Lass likes the telly mag  ;D Not disrespecting Our_lass  :-*
Other than that, I don't buy any newspapers. Apart from the DT to see whose passed away locally.
My posts on here have always been my 'my' own. If I don't like, or do like, I post. Regardless of where from.

Just hope I don't switch the lappy on in the morning and find the US has 'hit' Syria  :(
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #40 on: August 31, 2013, 09:47:49 PM »
I watched Obama live on tv this afternoon and he said he was going to put it to Congress before he starts on Syria - a few days away.
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Fly

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,169
  • ' M8IFY '
    • View Profile
    • Taximania
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #41 on: August 31, 2013, 09:52:28 PM »
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2013, 11:15:55 PM »
You should have made it clear in your post what it was about.
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Pete

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 5,702
    • View Profile
    • Peter Maycock - Chesterfield
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #43 on: September 01, 2013, 07:26:57 PM »
Two questions have been ringing in my head today as I read various articles about Syria:

1. Why would Syria’s Assad invite United Nations chemical weapons inspectors to Syria, then launch a chemical weapons attack against women and children on the very day they arrive, just miles from where they are staying?

2. If Assad were going to use chemical weapons, wouldn’t he use them against the hired mercenary army trying to oust him? What does he gain attacking women and children? Nothing! The gain is all on the side of the US Government desperate to get the war agenda going again.

http://chesterfieldonline.org/index.php/topic,3649.msg24278.html#msg24278

Did anyone watch this?
I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left.

Old Cruser

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 8,794
  • Water please Not wine
    • View Profile
Re: Syrian chemical weapons attack
« Reply #44 on: September 01, 2013, 09:28:16 PM »
Nothing woud surprise me Pete.
There is so much behind the scenes which we don't know about and never will.

When are congress due to get together, not really heard much of the news today apart from France saying they can't do it alone.
I believe it's been said that even if the evidence is stacked up against Assad our Parliament won't be asked to vote again - anyone else heard this.

A bit off topic but OH read out a news report from his phone about a cargo ship being fired at from Egypt whilst going through the Suez Canal -?
The old lady with the wonky middle finger

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk